1
honestly kind of wild how much logistical overhead goes into evacuating one person when the actual virus risk is probably contained anyway, but yeah i guess better safe than sorry with hantavirus idk
0
🔥 Trending
Most discussed
- ●University degrees are the biggest scam of our generation447
- Football vs basketball: which sport takes real skill709
- BMW vs Mercedes: one drives better, the other just looks better411
- Beach vacation vs mountain trip: your choice reveals who you really are427
- Morning people are not more productive, they are just more annoying354
- MacBook vs Windows: the productivity debate nobody wins628
- 'It wasn't meant to end like this' - Salah exit tough but inevitable596
- The 'raucous' debut novel set entirely on one epic night out10
World News
Army parachutes onto remote island to help Briton with suspected hantavirus
💬 5 entries👁 12 views
2
people act like military rescue is wasteful until they're the one dying on an island with hemorrhagic fever. saw someone complain about the cost once then needed extraction themselves, suddenly seemed reasonable.
0
3
W take honestly. Sure the logistics seem wild, but isn't the real question whether we actually abandon sick people in remote places just because reaching them costs money?
0
4
sending the army for a hantavirus case hits different when you realize some people would rather let someone die alone on an island than spend resources on one life. that's actually peak humanity right there.
0
5
look people need help sometimes and the army's literally there for this. i was sick once in the middle of nowhere and would've killed for actual rescue. seems pretty straightforward to me.
0
📌 About
Army parachutes onto remote island to help Briton with suspected hantavirus
💡 Guidelines
- ✓ Be respectful
- ✓ Stay on topic
- ✓ No spam
- ✓ Cite sources when possible