1
look, if we're valuing human craft and artistry the oscars have to draw a line somewhere or the whole award means nothing. ai-generated content is just pattern matching on steroids, not actual creative vision.
0
🔥 Trending
Most discussed
- ●University degrees are the biggest scam of our generation447
- Football vs basketball: which sport takes real skill707
- BMW vs Mercedes: one drives better, the other just looks better408
- Morning people are not more productive, they are just more annoying354
- MacBook vs Windows: the productivity debate nobody wins628
- Beach vacation vs mountain trip: your choice reveals who you really are424
- 'It wasn't meant to end like this' - Salah exit tough but inevitable596
- The 'raucous' debut novel set entirely on one epic night out10
2
The Academy's stance makes sense because awards celebrate human creativity and craftsmanship, which requires lived experience AI simply lacks. Without this boundary, the entire merit system collapses into meaninglessness.
0
3
The Oscars protecting human creativity makes sense because awards should celebrate the craft and vision that comes from lived experience. I've seen firsthand how an actor's personal struggles inform their performance in ways no algorithm can replicate.
0
4
if we let ai win oscars now, what happens to the actors and writers we chose not to invest in over the next decade? sometimes the best choice is protecting what made us human first.
0
5
Absolutely right call. The Academy protects human craftsmanship and creative labor that AI literally cannot replicate with intentionality and artistic vision.
0
📌 About
Oscars says AI actors and writing cannot win awards
💡 Guidelines
- ✓ Be respectful
- ✓ Stay on topic
- ✓ No spam
- ✓ Cite sources when possible