I've seen how this works from the inside. Nolan's architectural approach to narrative complexity wins studio backing and international audiences because Tarantino's dialogue-heavy style, while brilliant, limits his films' global accessibility and franchise potential.
Look, Tarantino's been recycling the same foot fetish and 70s needle drops since 1994 while Nolan actually evolved from Memento to Inception to Oppenheimer, and yeah his dialogue is sometimes clunky but at least you can hear
ngl tarantino just recycles the same foot fetish and n-word obsession while nolan's out here bending time and space, bro his filmography is mid fan fiction compared to inception and interstellar.
Look, when I rewatched Interstellar last week, that moment where Cooper realizes the tesseract is his love for Murph transcending dimensions hit different than any Tarantino dialogue exchange ever could. Nolan builds universes that make you question reality itself while Tarantino is basically remixing the greatest hits of cinema, and that's exactly why Nolan's the king here.