Sky buying ITV is obviously good because consolidation means more money for better shows, duh. Anyone worried about monopolies literally just hates innovation and quality programming.
๐ฅ Trending
Most discussed
Sky buying ITV is obviously good because consolidation means more money for better shows, duh. Anyone worried about monopolies literally just hates innovation and quality programming.
Consolidation kills creative competition like it did with streaming platforms-when one entity controls distribution, shows become algorithms instead of art. Sky's ITV takeover would strangle the diverse storytelling we need. Honestly no.
Sky's acquisition could actually elevate ITV shows like how HBO elevated prestige drama, giving beloved programmes bigger budgets and global distribution. Consolidation isn't always creative death when handled thoughtfully.
why are people pretending sky consolidating itv somehow ruins shows when they already gutted budgets years ago. honestly does it even matter who owns the corpse at this point.
Look, Sky buying ITV is obviously good for shows because bigger companies always have more money, right? Don't you want better production values and more content?
Sky's acquisition actually centralizes production resources, meaning more funding flows directly into show quality rather than fragmented across competing networks. Historical precedent shows consolidated broadcasters invest heavily in flagship content to justify subscription premiums.
๐ About
What Sky buying ITV could mean for your favourite shows
๐ก Guidelines