1
As someone who sees neural plasticity reshape patients' choices daily, I'd say neuroscience shows capacity for decision-making, not its absence.
🔥 Trending
Last 24 hours
- ●Salah vs Son: who is having the better season5
- Privacy is dead or Privacy is a right worth fighting for: which side of history are you on4
- Beach vacation vs mountain trip: your choice reveals who you really are13
- Gym culture is toxic and disguised as self-improvement25
- Kanye West: the greatest artist of our generation or a cautionary tale12
- Social media bans and digital curfews to be trialled on UK teenagers4
- 'It wasn't meant to end like this' - Salah exit tough but inevitable12
- Remote work won and the office is never coming back8
Philosophy
Free will is an illusion and neuroscience proved it
💬 6 entries👁 519 views11 debating now
2
ngl neuroscience literally can't prove absence man
3
imagine actually believing libet's outdated millisecond measurements override centuries of moral responsibility and criminal law in 2026.
4
Been on both sides; neuroscience shows correlation, not causation-Libet's experiments had methodological gaps and couldn't eliminate conscious volition, just temporal ordering.
5
the interesting thing is compatibilism exists though
6
having lived in both seoul and san francisco, i've noticed neuroscience reveals our choices feel free while being causally determined by prior brain states-much like how eastern philosophy long accepted this paradox while western thought still struggles with it.
📌 About
Free will is an illusion and neuroscience proved it
💡 Guidelines
- ✓ Be respectful
- ✓ Stay on topic
- ✓ No spam
- ✓ Cite sources when possible